Laramore v. Radford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court; Scott Wood, Judge; The inventory required by statute was filed. Kirby’s Digest, § 56-7. The estate was exempt. I'b. § 72-4. The estate was not insolvent. The widow had a right to the horses and could dispose of them. Ib. § 74. She was not barred by failure to make appraisement or file the list in time. 67 Ark. 283. No motion for new trial was filed nor is there any bill of exceptions.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court; Scott Wood, Judge; The inventory required by statute was filed. Kirby’s Digest, § 56-7. The estate was exempt. I'b. § 72-4. The estate was not insolvent. The widow had a right to the horses and could dispose of them. Ib. § 74. She was not barred by failure to make appraisement or file the list in time. 67 Ark. 283. No motion for new trial was filed nor is there any bill of exceptions. There is nothing before this court. 11 Ark. 190; 111 Id. 529; 90 Id. 316; 200 S. W. 132, and many others.
1Opinion of the CourtHaet, J.
This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace. There are no written pleadings contained in the record, but the transcript of the justice of the peace shows that on the 16th day of June, 1917, M. C. Laramore filed an affidavit against O. M. Eadford, Public Administrator, for the replevin of two horses. On the 7th day of July, 1917, the parties appeared and evidence was heard on a motion of the defendant to dismiss the case. After hearing the evidence, it was ordered that the motion be overruled, and that the plaintiff recover of the defendant the property involved in the action. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Billingsley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- James v. DyerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
- Heard v. McCabeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Armstrong v. LawsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- Helton v. HoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Hale v. Road Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1921