Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Mahle

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion by plaintiff for the appointment of a commissioner in condemnation proceedings, in place of a deceased commissioner.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

By a judgment of condemnation three commissioners were appointed to appraise defendants’ damages occasioned by plaintiff’s taking certain lands for railroad purposes; the three commissioners viewed the premises, and thereupon the plaintiff took possession and materially altered the conditions and situation of the same. Pending a hearing to take testimony, one commissioner died, and plaintiff moves for the appointment of a new commissioner in place of the decedent. The plaintiff contends that it is entitled to the judgment and opinion of three commissioners as to defendants’ compensation. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Petition of MerriamNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. People Ex Rel. Kingsland v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Gildersleeve v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
  4. Pell v. UlmarNew York Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moll v. City of LockportNew York Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. MahleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. RicciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. In re the Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API