Legal Opinion

Moll v. City of Lockport

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtTayloe, J.

The plaintiffs bring this action in general to enjoin the defendants from enforcing a resolution of the board of health of the city of Lockport, adopted March 10, 1922. Plaintiffs also make this motion to enjoin the defendants pendente lite from enforcing said resolution. The resolution reads as follows:

“ Resolved, that no milk other than certified, Grade ‘ A ’ Raw and Grade ‘ A ’ Pasteurized be offered for sale in the City of Lockport, New York, after May 31, 1922.”

*574Plaintiffs assert that the injunction should be granted for the three following reasons:

1. That the resolution is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People Ex Rel. v. . NostrandNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. MahleNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lake Shore & M. S. Ry. Co. v. MahleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Natural Milk Producers Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Talbot v. Board of EducationNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API