Legal Opinion

Venn v. . Coleman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 2, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

Tbe question presented, as stated by plaintiffs; bas tbe court tbe power to allow a defendant to plead after service of summons in tbe manner provided by law for nonresidents: unless tbe court finds facts showing good cause and a meritorious defense upon proper and competent evidence? On tbe first proposition, we tbink on tbe record, tbe facts showed good cause and tbe clerk so found. On the second proposition, we tbink, on tbe record there must be set forth facts showing prima facie a valid defense which was shown in this case, and tbe clerk so found that tbe defendants bad a good…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goodman v. . GoodmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Holcomb v. . HolcombSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. McNair v. . YarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Bowie v. . TuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Helderman v. Hartsell Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blankenship v. . DecascoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API