Legal Opinion
United States v. Jesus Palta, A/K/A "Jesus Antonio Palta Morales", A/K/A "Luis Eduardo Toro", and Edison A. Marmolejo
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 10, 1989No. 1122, 1233, Dockets 89-1051, 89-1057PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTIMARI, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Jesus Palta and Edison A. Marmolejo appeal sentences imposed under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq. and 28 U.S.C. §§ 991-98, (the “Act”), following judgments of conviction by guilty pleas entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kevin T. Duffy, Judge). On this appeal, neither of the defendants challenges the underlying conviction, but both now argue that the district court erred in imposing sentence. Specifically, Palta contends that the district court’s imposition of concurrent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Humberto CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Luis Fernando Correa-VargasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Nelson Guerrero, Cesar Rivera and Anthony MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- United States v. James Alan BurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Tyrone SturgisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Arthur MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Scott FranzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Won Tae KimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.