Legal Opinion
Soble Construction Co. v. Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 31, 1974No. Appeal, No. 1746 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
On December 17, 1971 the Soble Construction Company (developer), which was the equitable owner of a 26.47 acre tract in the Borough of East Stroudsburg (Borough), filed an application for approval of plans to erect a planned unit development of 238 units in a number of multi-family dwellings. The developer’s tract was located in an R-l district where the principal permitted use at that time was for single-family detached dwellings but the local zoning ordinance then permitted planned unit development for multi-family dwellings in that district as a special use. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Concord Township AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Heck v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Omnipoint Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Susquehanna Township Board of Commissioners v. Hardee's Food Systems, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Allegheny Tower Associates, LLC v. City of Scranton Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Shamah v. Hellam Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.