Omnipoint Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove Township
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is filed under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332, (“TCA”). The Plaintiffs in this case, Omni-point Corporation (“Omni”) and Linda Genth, seek review of the Zoning Hearing Board of Pine Grove Township’s (“Board”) denial of its application for a special exception under § 902(3) of the Pine Grove Township Ordinance (“Zoning Ordinance”).
We have reviewed the record and conclude that for the following reasons, Defendants have violated the TCA and Plaintiffs are entitled to the relief requested. 1
II.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bray v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lower Moreland Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- BellSouth Mobility Inc. v. Gwinnett County, GADistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
- Western PCS II Corp. v. Extraterritorial Zoning Authority of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cellular Telephone Company, Doing Business as at & T Wireless Services v. The Town of Oyster Bay and the Town Board of the Town of Oyster BayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Omnipoint Corporation v. Zoning Hearing Board Of Pine Grove TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Iowa Wireless Servs. LP v. City of Moline, Ill.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1998
- Cellular Telephone Co. v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the Borough of Harrington ParkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Ogden Fire Co. No. 1 v. Upper Chichester TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.