Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Norris

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 28, 1896No. Nos. 10,199—(143)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendants Michael Norris and Mary Norris from an order of the district court for,St. Louis county, Moer, J., denying a motion for a new trial and from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs for $11,084.06.

1Opinion of the Court

STABT, O. J.

This action, which was one to recover damages for a breach of the covenants of warranty and right to convey in a deed of land, was here on a former appeal by the plaintiff from an order denying his motion for a new trial. See 63 Minn. 156, 65 N. W. 357, for a full statement of the facts of the case. Upon such appeal it was held by this court that, upon the facts found by the trial court, there was a breach of the covenants; that the plaintiff was entitled to full damages; that the order appealed from should be reversed, and the case remanded to the district court, with directions *49t…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schleuder v. CoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Tilleny v. WolvertonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Bradley v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Layman v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Maxwell v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Vaule v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Orr v. SuttonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  4. Snyder v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Nicholson v. MetcalfMontana Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API