Thrasher v. Neeley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Gadsden City Court. Heard before.Hon. John H. Disque. Action by R. F. Neely against G. W. Thrasher and others, as indemnitors by bond to the sheriff to procure the levy of. an execution. Judgment for plaintiff and defendants appeal. Transferred from the Court of Appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Suit by appellee against appellants, who were obligors on an indemnity bond to the sheriff of Etowah county, executed for the purpose of procuring a levy on certain personal property in the possession of one. J. H. Neely, by virtue of an execution in favor of one of the appellants, G. W. Thrasher, issued out of a justice court against said J. H. Neely. The property levied on was one mule and thirty bushels of corn, and constituted the subject of this controversy. - •
Counts 1 and 2 were in trespass and trover respectively. Count 5 was in case, for the destruction of a landlord’s lien. Count 6,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Waite, LaFils & Co. v. CorbinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Screws v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1872
- Clark v. Johnson & LattimerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- J. H. Anders Mercantile Co. v. Rice Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Reese v. MacKentepeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Bradley v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Warrant Warehouse Co. v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Anniston Banking Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Alabama Power Co. v. HinesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.