Legal Opinion

Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Thorpe

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 29, 1996No. 3:93-cr-00110PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COFFMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon Eddie R. Brown’s and E & M Coal Company’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint in Intervention of NSA Inc., Commonwealth Auminum Corporation and Acan Auminum Corporation (“the Auminum Companies”) [Record No. 252], The Auminum Companies have direct and derivative state law claims against Eddie R. Brown and E & M Coal Corporation (“the Eddie Brown defendants”) pending in this ease. The derivative claims are for breach of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, tortious…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Chandler v. Anthem Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1999
  2. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co. v. Kentucky Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2007
  3. Louisa Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API