Legal Opinion

Culliford v. . Walser

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 13, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit, a jury having been waived.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 13, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Circuit, a jury having been waived. This action was brought for the recovery of the sum of $1,000, with interest, upon an undertaking given by defendants as bail to discharge one Montgomery G-add from arrest in an action instituted against him by this plaintiff. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The primary liability rests upon the later sureties.…

1Opinion of the Court

Parker, Ch. J.

The facts, so far as they need be stated in order to present the point we are to decide, are as follows: Culliford, this plaintiff, in a civil action against Gadd, obtained an order of arrest; to secure the latter’s discharge therefrom Walser and McHugh (these defendants) became bail in the sum of one thousand dollars that Gadd would at all times, render himself amenable to the process of the court during the pendency of the action and to any mandate issued to enforce the final judgment against him; the result of the action was a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. . KreitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Pott v. NathansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841
  3. Chester v. . BroderickNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  2. 500 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. NielsenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968
  3. Ducas v. Federal Union Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  4. Katz v. MendelsohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Reily v. CrymesMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API