Legal Opinion

Crooks' Estate

Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Lycoming County

Decided May 20, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Rhone, J.,

I

We have concluded that the orphans’ court does have jurisdiction to prorate taxes as set forth in the Act of July 2,1937, P. L. 2762, (1) upon any accounting, or (2) in any appropriate action unless the testator otherwise directs in his will. The Supreme Court held in Jeffery’s Estate, 333 Pa. 15, that a testator was presumed to have known that Federal estate taxes were payable out of his property. He is likewise presumed to have known that the State of Pennsylvania is clothed with power to put in force the Act of 1937, supra, providing for proration of taxes between those who take…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Jeffery's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. McGovern's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Johnson v. NelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Hober's EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. New England Deaconess HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API