Legal Opinion
Bordonaro Bros. Theatres v. Paramount Pictures
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 9, 1949No. 227, Docket 21160PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
176 F.2d 594 (1949)
BORDONARO BROS. THEATRES, Inc.,
v.
PARAMOUNT PICTURES, Inc., et al.
No. 227, Docket 21160.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued May 12, 1949.
Decided August 9, 1949.
Frank G. Raichle, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Raichle, Tucker & Moore and James O. Moore, Jr., all of Buffalo, N. Y., on the brief), for Paramount Pictures, Inc., and Warner Bros. Circuit Management Corporation, defendants-appellants.
F. T. Anderson, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Gray, Anderson, Schaffer & Rome, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Skadden, Arps, Slate & Lyon, of New York City, on the brief), for Bordonaro Bros.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Brookside Theatre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Autowest, Inc. v. Peugeot, Inc., and Associete De Automobiles PeugeotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Milgram v. Loew's, Inc. (Hamilton Street Realty Company, Intervenors)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Richfield Oil Corporation v. Karseal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.