Legal Opinion

Columbia Knickerbocker Trust Co. v. Finney

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 14, 1914No. Nos. 18,934 and 18,935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

■ Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff in each of these cases has filed an application for the allowance of damages, including the fees and expenses of attorneys. In July, 1913, when the cases were commenced, there was a hearing before the court upon an application for the allowance of an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the defendant officers of the city of Atchison to levy a tax for the payment of defaulted bonds issued by the city. The plaintiffs owned $55,000 of the bonds; the defendant officers had recognized the validity of the bonds but had failed and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nolte v. Montgomery Home Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barten v. Turkey Creek Watershed Joint District No. 32Supreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  2. Smith v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Shea v. CockingMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Braine v. City of StroudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. State ex rel. O'Sullivan v. District Court of Tenth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API