Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1900PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Dallas. Tried below before Hon. W. J. J. Smith.

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO FILE TRANSCRIPT

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

This is a motion by appellant to be allowed to file a transcript in this cause, the statutory period of ninety days in which .the law permits transcripts to be filed having expired. The appeal was perfected on July 15, 1899, and this motion was filed August 9, 1900. The causes for the failure to file are set forth in the motion, which we here insert, omitting the formal parts, to wit: “That this appeal was perfected on the 15th day of July, 1899, and that the ninety days period within which, under the law, this appellant should have filed his…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consolidated Casualty Insurance Company v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. People v. NyeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Smith v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Choate v. Canada Life Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API