Legal Opinion
Consolidated Casualty Insurance Company v. Wade
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 19, 1963No. Motion 18PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NYE, Justice.
Appellant, on October 22, 1963, filed Motion No. 18 herein asking for an extension of time within which to file the statement of facts and transcript with the Clerk of this Court. The Motion is not verified, does not show on what date the judgment was rendered, whether or not a motion for new trial was filed, nor from what court the appeal has been taken. The motion admits that the appellant has not filed a transcript and statement of facts with the clerk of this Court within the sixty days required by Rule 386 Texas Rules of Civil Procedure.
Rule 386 T.R.C.P. provides as follows:…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matlock v. MatlockTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Walker v. CleereTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Schleicher v. RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Ortiz v. Associated Employers LloydsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Dellerman v. TragerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Whitt v. HartgravesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Valdez v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Hogan v. G., C. & SF RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Home Fund, Inc. v. GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Meridian Resources, Inc. v. Colley Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.