Legal Opinion

Leader Holding Corp. v. McLintock

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 5, 1937PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Complainant, owning a parcel of land in Union county, requested defendant Brody to list the land with real estate agents and to take such other steps as might occur to him in order to bring about a sale. Nothing was said about his compensation. Brody listed the land with Mrs. McLintock, the other defendant, and brought her and the officers of complainant together. She found a purchaser willing to pay $33,000 and his offer was accepted, although the price was less than complainant had hoped to obtain. When the contract of sale was signed, complainant told Mrs. McLintock that it was unwilling…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mount Holly, Lumberton, & Medford Turnpike Co. v. FerreeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1864
  2. Wakeman v. KingslandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1889
  3. Leddel's v. StarrNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1869
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. StevensonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  5. Pratt v. WorrellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Business Finance Co. v. WeitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
  2. Blanchard v. VoghelConnecticut Superior Court · 1943
  3. The Four Plating Co., Inc. v. MakoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. KelseyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  5. Westwood Ford Sale, C., Inc. v. BlumenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API