Legal Opinion

Wakeman v. Kingsland

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided October 15, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On motion to strike out cross-bills.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This is an interpleader suit. The bill is a strict interpleader bill, and not a bill in the nature of an interpleader bill. Briefly stated, the case made by the bill is as follows: A firm of builders, doing business under the name of Noble & Van Aulen, agreed in writing with the complainant, by two separate contracts made on different dates, to erect and finish two double houses and two other buildings for two distinct sums, to be paid in certain specific parts as the work progressed; the contracts were filed in such manner as exempt the buildings from lien except to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bedell v. HoffmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1830

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Jersey Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. AltieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Leader Holding Corp. v. McLintockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  4. C.F. Duke Storage Warehouse, Inc. v. KellerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API