Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Ward

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1978No. 771SC310PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The search for testamentary intent is the primary task in the interpretation of this or any other will. We must look at the language employed by the testatrix in the light of the circumstances known to her when she drafted her will. Other “rules of construction” so often recited by the courts are, in many cases, merely labels that are placed on the court’s conclusions in order to buttress the result reached.

Emma Ward’s husband and her son were both lawyers. Even so, she would probably agree that only lawyers would argue that there could be any doubt as to what she meant when she…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Schwren v. . FallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Anders v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Rountree v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brinkley v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Cassada v. CassadaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API