Legal Opinion
In Re Rmt
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided October 5, 2011No. 06-11-00037-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
352 S.W.3d 12 (2011)
In the Interest of R.M.T., a Child.
No. 06-11-00037-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Texarkana.
Submitted: September 28, 2011.
Decided: October 5, 2011.
Benjamin Bratteli, Longview, for appellant.
Michael C. Shulman, Office of General Counsel, Austin, for appellee.
Before MORRISS, C.J., CARTER and MOSELEY, JJ.
OPINION
Opinion by Justice MOSELEY.
The parental rights existing between John and Melissa with their child, R.M.T.,[1] were terminated following a bench trial in which the trial court made findings that the evidence supported by clear and convincing evidence requisite supported…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.