People v. Walker
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
A jury found defendant guilty of robbery. He appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
In seeking a reversal defendant contends that (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) the district attorney was guilty of misconduct; (3) the court prejudicially erred in its rulings; and (4) the jury was guilty of misconduct.
On October 13, 1956, at approximately 7 o’clock in the evening, the Safeway grocery store at Sunset and Sanborn Streets, in Los Angeles, was robbed by two men.
As the two men entered the store they were immediately observed by one of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. DaughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Dillard v. McKnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. SmallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- People v. McGrawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. TornelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- (HC) Lopez v. ShermanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019