Legal Opinion
Rickard v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 16, 1987No. 13-85CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons discussed herein, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment is allowed in part as it relates to the jurisdiction of this Court. The remainder of plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment on the merits is denied, however, because the Court concludes that genuine issues of material facts exist.
Facts
The plaintiff, Mr. Robert Rickard, seeks an award of compensation to informants (otherwise known as moieties), pursuant to statutory…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Brunswick Corporation v. Harold VinebergCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Garza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Hoch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Hoch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Pacific National Cellular v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.