Legal Opinion
THE HERTZ CORPORATION v. FRISSORA
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 26, 2023No. 2:19-cv-08927Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THE HERTZ CORPORATION and HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC., Case No. 19cv08927 (EP) CLW) Plaintiffs, OPINION V. MARK FRISSORA, ef al., Defendants. PADIN, District Judge. In this breach of contract action, Plaintiffs Hertz Corporation and Hertz Global Holdings (collectively, “Hertz”) move for partial summary judgment (D.E. 290 (“Hertz Mot.”)) and Defendant Mark Frissora cross-moves for summary judgment (D.E. 294 (‘Frissora Mot.”)). The Court will decide both motions without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); L.Civ.R.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Weichert Co. Realtors v. RyanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Messa v. Omaha Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.