Legal Opinion
Vitale v. Dunnett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 11, 1961No. 39026PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
365 P.2d 122 (1961)
Joseph VITALE, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
Dan R. DUNNETT, Defendant in Error.
No. 39026.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 11, 1961.
Rehearing Denied October 3, 1961.
Cantrell, Douglass, Thompson & Wilson, Oklahoma City, Miskovsky & Miskovsky, by Thomas W. Sullivan, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Little & Hoyt by Lester D. Hoyt, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error.
IRWIN, Justice.
Joseph Vitale, defendant below, appeals from the judgment of the trial court permanently enjoining him from operating a beauty parlor at his home in Oklahoma City. Our reference to the parties will be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Werfelman v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Progress Brewing Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wabaunsee v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Stork v. StorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Midwest City v. EckroatSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
- Edwards v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.