North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff’s arguments for equitable relief are cast in the orthodox mold, viz.: irreparable harm by the ICC orders; the sought injunction will cause no injury or damage to others; continued effectiveness of the filed Tariffs and rates will cause sales of natural gas to Carolina Power and Light Company to be uneconomical to plaintiff and destroy contractual arrangements entered by that company with plaintiff, with the resultant destruction of plaintiff as a competitor; and, finally, to permit the Tariffs to remain effective “is not in the public interest.” In…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sims v. GreeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. GittoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Donald H. Jacobs, Doing Business as the Jacobs Instrument Company v. J. Millard Tawes, Comptroller of the Treasury, State of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bateman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
- North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1963
- Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Ikirt v. Lee National Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.