Dyment v. Lewis
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. David Mould, Judge. Suit for permanent injunction resulted in decree as prayed. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The plaintiff began business in 1893 under the name and style of the “Robe & Tanning Company” at Leeds, a suburb of Sioux City. He has always conducted his correspondence and kept his bank account in that name and done most of his advertising in that name; but soon after beginning business letters, orders, and consignments began coming to him addressed “Sioux City Robe & Tanning Company,” and have continued ever since. Roth names *511appear in the directories and telephone books. He employed both names on his place of business, in his booth at a fair conducted within the city limits, and on a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- French Republic v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- C. A. Briggs Co. v. National Wafer Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Charcoal Steak House of Charlotte, Inc. v. StaleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lawyers Title Ins. Co. v. Lawyers Title Ins. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Yellow Cab Co. v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- M. M. Newcomer Co. v. Newcomer's New StoreTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.