Legal Opinion

United States v. Earl Coplon

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1964No. 16288_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Coplon refused to answer certain questions that were directed to him as a witness before a grand jury, pleading privilege against self-incrimination. On December 9, 1964, he was brought before the Honorable John W. Peck, U. S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, who explained to him that pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 409(0 he would be immune from any prosecution, federal or state, by reason of any testimony that he might give. Appellant persisted in his refusal to answer the questions.

Judge Peck gave the following direction to appellant:

“It being the determination of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  4. Oriel v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Grand Jury and Susan Marie ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  2. United States v. Thomas GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  3. In Re Grand Jury Investigation of Sam Giancana, in the Matter of the Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Sam Giancana v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  4. In Re LazarusDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967
  5. In Re LoughranDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API