Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Health and Social Services Bd. of State of Wis.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 21, 1967No. 67-C-329PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAIRCHILD, Circuit Judge.

This is an action for injunction against enforcement of certain provisions of the Wisconsin Statutes upon the ground of their unconstitutionality. The challenged provisions require an applicant for certain welfare aids to have continuously resided for one whole year in this state immediately prior to an application for relief. 1

Plaintiff Loretta Ramos is a citizen of the United States and a resident of the state of Wisconsin, whose application for aid to dependent children has been denied because her present period of continuous residence in Wisconsin is less than one…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Dawson v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Thompson v. ShapiroDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1967
  4. Green v. Department of Public Welfare of State of Del.District Court, D. Delaware · 1967
  5. Harrell v. TobrinerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Smith v. ReynoldsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Johnson v. RobinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. Boddie v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1970
  5. Rivera v. DunnDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API