Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Frankenhoff
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided May 21, 1999No. 98-154PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
Arvid and Karen Frankenhoff appeal from an order of the superior court dismissing their tort claims against Bernard Food Industries, Inc. (“Bernard Foods”) and Shefsky & Froelich, Ltd. Bernard Foods is an Illinois-based food wholesaler; Shefsky & Froelich is a Chicago law firm. The Frankenhoffs, who were originally named as defendants in this proceeding, impleaded Bernard Foods and Shefsky & Froelich as additional defendants in their counterclaims asserted against plaintiff Jon E Schwartz, but the court concluded it lacked personal jurisdiction over either of the parties it dismissed. We…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Northern Security Insurance Co. v. Mitec Electronics, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- State v. Atlantic Richfield CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- Siliski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Brown v. Cal Dykstra Equipment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- Adams v. Citizens Auto Fin., Inc.Vermont Superior Court · 2010
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.