Legal Opinion

Crawfordsville Shale Brick Co. v. Starbuck

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1923No. 11,696PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, C. J.

The Manufacturers’ Equipment Company of Dayton, Ohio, entered into a written agreement whereby it agreed to furnish certain materials, detailed plans and the necessary engineering service for the installation of a gas-burning system for appellant’s plant at Crawfordsville. Said agreement, in addition to the provision that the equipment company was to furnish “the necessary engineering service,” provided as follows: “It is understood and agreed that we (the equipment company) are to furnish the services of an experienced man during the necessary period of time to supervise construction and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. McDowell v. DuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Indiana Iron Co. v. CrayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Dallas Manfg. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  5. In re DuncanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ellegood v. Brashear Freight Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Lazarus v. SchererIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Berrier v. Associated Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. General Printing Corp. v. Umback, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Heffner v. WhiteIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API