Legal Opinion

In re Duncan

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1920No. 10,810PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceeding by Frank Duncan against the Grant Coal and Mining Company under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Certified questions of law submitted by the Industrial Board.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

The Industrial Board has certified the following statement of facts to this court:

The Grant Coal and Mining Company, on July 11, 1919, and for many years prior thereto, was engaged in the business of mining, selling and shipping coal from a mine in Vigo county, Indiana, known as the Grant Mine, and employed in its said business approximately *271400 men. The coal in said mine cannot be mined easily or profitably with a pick without first being blasted. For the purpose of blasting the coal, holes are drilled into the face thereof. These holes are then charged with powder and tamped, with fuses…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Peet v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. City of Milwaukee v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Lewis & Clark County v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  5. Haluptzok v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Baker v. WESTINGHOUSE ELEC. CORP. & MONSANTO CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mann v. SchnarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Talas v. Correct Piping Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. McDowell v. DuerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API