Legal Opinion
Kent County Ex Rel. Board of Supervisors v. Reed
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1928No. Calendar 33,680PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.
Act No. 379, Local Acts 1891, is entitled:
“An act to provide for the compensation and to prescribe the duties of certain officers of the county of Kent.”
In it the salary of the register of deeds is fixed at $2,500 per annum. He had theretofore been entitled to the fees fixed by statute. Act No. 333, Pub. Acts 1919 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 2514 [1, 2]), reads as follows:
“An act to provide for the fixing of the salaries of all county officials, their assistants, deputies and clerks by the board of supervisors in those counties where said county officials, their assistants, deputies and clerks…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- City of Grand Rapids v. BurlingameMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1975 PA 227Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. KevorkianMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. BarberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Seals v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.