Legal Opinion

Morochnick v. Quigley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 24, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.

This case reaches us on appeal from denial by a Superior Court judge of the defendant’s motion to recover costs incurred in an earlier appeal. In Morochnick v. Quigley, 17 Mass. App. Ct. 1035 (1984), the Appeals Court reversed a Superior Court judgment for the plaintiff, and ordered that the action be dismissed. The defendant then filed a motion in the Superior Court to recover the costs of printing and filing his appellate brief and record appendix, together with a verified bill of costs. The judge denied the defendant’s motion and a subsequent motion for reconsideration. The defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. SpillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Morochnick v. QuigleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strand v. HubbardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. Hunt v. McKendryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API