Legal Opinion

Morochnick v. Quigley

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 29, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant cross appeals from a judgment entered against him on the plaintiff’s claim of intentional interference with an advantageous business relationship. (The plaintiff’s appeal was dismissed for failure to file a brief in a timely manner.)

The trial judge found that the defendant had telephoned the plaintiff s supervisor on several occasions to complain about the plaintiffs work habits in an attempt to have the plaintiff fired. These efforts were unsuccessful. The trial judge concluded that the elements of the tort of intentional interference with an advantageous business relationship…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Chemawa Country Golf, Inc. v. WnukMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  3. Sharratt v. Housing Innovations, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. H. D. Watts Co. v. American Bond & Mortgage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mass Cash Register, Inc. v. Comtrex Systems Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  2. Morochnick v. QuigleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Cambridge Internet Solutions, Inc. v. Avicon GroupMassachusetts Superior Court · 1999
  4. Baxter, Inc. v. LandryMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007
  5. Opti-Copy, Inc. v. DalpeMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API