Legal Opinion
Ewing v. City of Carmel-By-The-Sea
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 9, 1991No. H007702PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Plaintiff homeowners challenge the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance prohibiting transient commercial use of residential property for remuneration for less than 30 consecutive days. The trial court upheld the ordinance. We affirm.
Factual And Procedural Background
Plaintiffs are owners of single-family, residential property zoned R-l in the City of Carmel-by-the-Sea. Plaintiffs challenge Ordinance No. 89-17, unanimously adopted by the Carmel City Council in May 1989. The ordinance prohibits the “Transient Commercial Use of Residential Property for Remuneration . . . in the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gangemi v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Houston v. Wilson Mesa Ranch Homeowners Association, IncColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- College Area Renters & Landlord Ass'n v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Brown v. Sandy City Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.