Legal Opinion
Favell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 22, 1991No. Nos. 525-76T, 531-76, 42-77, 43-77 and 122-77PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
These consolidated and related cases1 are currently before the court pursuant to defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss” certain portions of certain of the cases.2 In its motion, defendant argues that the court should dismiss specific claims for refund, as listed in Appendix A, Tables 1, 2, 3, as amended, A, B, and 5 (attached to defendant’s motion and included as Exhibit I to this Opinion), pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Rules of the United States Claims Court. As grounds for dismissal, the defendant states that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of those particular…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. LombardoSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Emanuel Weisbart v. United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Rohmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Dresser Industries, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
- McIlvaine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Speck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.