Legal Opinion
Hill v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided September 29, 1983No. 637-82TPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PLAINTIFFS’ APPLICATION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COURT COSTS
WHITE, Senior Judge.
On May 6, 1983, the plaintiffs filed an application for an award of attorneys’ fees and court costs under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(a) and (d) (Supp. V 1981). The application stated in part that “plaintiff1 is the prevail*429ing party who incurred fees and other expenses in his civil action against the United States in a court having jurisdiction of the action, when the position of the United States Internal Revenue Service was not substantially justified.”
In an affidavit supporting the application, the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chemical Manufacturers Association, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Photo Data, Inc. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Alspach v. District Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL U. NO. 3, ETC. v. BohnDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- AABCO, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
- Trone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Laboratory Supply Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.