Legal Opinion

AABCO, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 3, 1983No. 411-83CPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s timely application for attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Supp. V 1981) (EAJA). The application stated in part that plaintiff was entitled to reasonably-incurred attorney’s fees of at least $21,443.75, and that the position of the United States in this action was not substantially justified. The plaintiff also requested reimbursement for certain costs.

For the reasons discussed herein, this Court denies the plaintiff’s application for fees and costs.

Background

The attorney’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Leroy H. Ellis v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. August Gava, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Aparacor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Connolly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Essex Electro Engineers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  2. United Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Giesecke v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1986
  4. Snowbank Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  5. Laboratory Supply Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API