Legal Opinion
People v. Matos
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided July 19, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert D. Kalish, J.
The People’s motion to compel the defendant Ivan Matos to permit the taking of oral swab samples from his body pursuant to CPL 240.40 and the defendant’s cross motion for a protective order pursuant to Executive Law § 995-d restricting the disclosure of the results of said testing are both granted as follows:
*254In the instant criminal action, the defendant is charged with crimes stemming from two separate alleged times and places of occurrence (TPOs).
On the first TPO on or about December 27, 2011 at approximately 12:10 p.m. at 177 Avenue T, apartment IF in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- People v. KalinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. DebrauxNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. AcostaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015
- People v. HalleNew York Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. SanonNew York Supreme Court · 2016