Legal Opinion
People v. Debraux
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 2015PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marcy L. Kahn, J.
Defendants Aubin Debraux and Davone Merritt, by individual motions made in two separate indictments, have sought to preclude the People from introducing at their trials expert testimony as to any results derived from the use of the forensic statistical tool (FST), a mathematical computer software program developed and used by the Forensic Biology Unit of the New York City Office of the Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) to calculate a likelihood ratio that a specific individu*249al’s deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) is part of a mixture of DNA found on crime scene…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- People v. WesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Parker v. Mobil Oil Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. LeGrandNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. Bullard-DanielNew York County Court, Niagara County · 2016
- People v. LopezNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- Matter of Francis O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Francis O.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.