State Ex Rel. Buse v. Drewniak
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The ultimate question for determination herein is whether Wartchow and the twenty-one other persons-similarly situated, on whose behalf the petition for relief by a writ of mandamus was filed, are entitled, under sec. 56.08, Stats. 1947, to the relief sought in view of the following facts •alleged in the petition and deemed admitted upon respondent’s motion to quash the alternative writ, to wit:
Wartchow, and said twenty-one other petitioners were found guilty of civil contempt by the circuit court for Milwaukee county, and the judgment entered on July 25, 1947, to that effect provided, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wisconsin Gas & Electric Co. v. City of Fort AtkinsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Fox v. Milwaukee Mechanics' InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by2 opinions
- Conston v. New Mexico State Board of Probation & ParoleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011