Legal Opinion

Local Union No. 300, Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. McCulloch

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 19, 1970No. 27245PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge:

The exclusion of farm workers from coverage under the NLRA, 29 U.S.C.A. § *398151 et seq., is challenged here by the plaintiff Union. The challenge is both statutory and constitutional. The arguments are twofold. First, that workers, su ch as those who are members of this Union, who work on a permanent basis on large mechanized farms are not “agricultural laborers” within the meaning of the Act. Second, the failure of Congress to include such agricultural workers under the Act deprives them of equal protection. The constitutional claim is presented in the framework…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dale v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Local Union No. 300 v. MccullochCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  3. N.L.R.B. v. Cal-Maine Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. No. 169Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. United States Court of Appeals, Second CircuitCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API