Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Patterson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 10, 1998No. 72,866Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

969 S.W.2d 16 (1998)

Ex parte Cecil PATTERSON.

No. 72,866.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1998.

Cecil Ray Patterson, Amarillo, pro se.

Kathleen Walsh, Assistant District Attorney, Denton, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

OPINION ON COURT'S OWN MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Opinion of the Court · HollandHolland, Judge, joined by McCORMICK Presiding Judge, and Keller, Price and Womack Judges,

This is a post-conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. TEX.CRIM. PROC.CODE ANN. § 11.07 (Vernon 1994). Applicant files this writ attacking his conviction for attempted capital murder in which the jury assessed punishment,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence; Dissent.

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Ex Parte CannonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API