Legal Opinion
Hastert v. Illinois State Board of Election Commissioners
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 17, 1993No. Nos. 92-1397 to 92-1399, 92-1402 and 92-1403PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
We are asked here to review a decision of a three-judge district court denying attorneys’ fees to certain parties involved in litigation regarding congressional redistricting in Illinois following the 1990 census. We initially decided that we had jurisdiction over the appeals brought by the Hastert, Nieves, Urban League and Scott plaintiffs, but jurisdiction over the Rosebrook appeal only to the extent that they appealed the district court’s denial of their Rule 60(b) motion to reconsider its judgment. Hastert v. State Board of Election, Nos. 92-1397, 92-1398, 92-1399,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Exxon Co., USA v. Sofec, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Elaine TRUSKOSKI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESPN, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Brandon v. Guilford Cnty. Bd. of ElectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- Sidak v. Pinnacle Telemarketing Ltd.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2002
- In Re Mercury Finance Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.