Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. Dunlap

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 62PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Collingwood, J., presiding. Bill by Jessie Carlisle against Mary E. Dunlap and others to set aside a mortgage foreclosure. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

The plaintiff borrowed $172.50 and to secure its payment executed a second mortgage upon certain real estate in Detroit to Mary E. Dunlap, as well as a promissory note, bearing interest at 4 per cent, per annum, payable monthly, due nine months after date. This was on May 26, 1914. She paid various sums, amounting in the aggregate to $75 —September 1,- 1914, $60; April 16, 1915, $10; May 7, 1915, $5. The property mortgaged is familiarly known as No. 479, Military avenue, and was leased by the plaintiff to a tenant or tenants.at a monthly rental. The first mortgage upon the property was for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cameron v. AdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Senters v. Ottawa Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Gordon Grossman Building Co. v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wood v. ButtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Dumas v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Blackwood v. SakwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API