Legal Opinion
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Peck-Schwartz Realty Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 8, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBippey, J.
The question here presented is whether movables, either unattached to the realty or severable and removable without material injury to the building, passed to the purchaser upon foreclosure of a real estate mortgage which, after describing the real property in detail, contained the following clause of coverage: “ together with all fixtures and articles of personal property, now or hereafter attached to, or used in connection with the premises, all of which are covered by this mortgage.” That clause is the same as the statutory form of covenant (Beal Prop. Law, § 254, subd. 1; Cons. Laws, ch.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Tifft v. . HortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Madfes v. Beverly Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Cohen v. 1165 Fulton Avenue Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Shelton Holding Corp. v. 150 East Forty-Eighth Street Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- General Synod of Reformed Church in America v. Bonac Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Connecticut General Life Insurance v. ReaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
- In re 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- New York & Suburban Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Crescent Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.