Legal Opinion

East River Savings Bank v. 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 21, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

It was error to strike out the answer of appellant and to grant summary judgment for plaintiff directing, among other things, foreclosure and sale of the personal property referred to in and asserted by plaintiff to be covered by the provisions of the real estate mortgage which this action was brought to foreclose. It appears from the pleadings and affidavits submitted on the motion that such property was not as matter of law so attached to and made a part of the building as to constitute fixtures. The intent that it should not be included within the coverage of the real estate mortgage could…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Peck-Schwartz Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Newfield v. East River Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
  2. Statewide Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Canoe Hill, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Statewide Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Canoe Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Adler v. Atlas Brick CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  5. In re 671 Prospect Avenue Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API