Legal Opinion

Fraternal Order of Police v. Stenehjem

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 7, 2005No. Nos. 03-3848, 04-1619, 04-1620PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

I

This case involves a facial challenge to North Dakota Century Code Chapter 51-28 (the “Act”), which prohibits certain telephone solicitations of North Dakota residents who register with the state’s “do-not-call” list. Plaintiffs are nonprofit organizations who rely on professional charitable solicitors for then’ fundraising.

The Act exempts telephone solicitations made by charitable organizations if “the telephone call is made by a. volunteer .or employee of the charitable organization” and the caller makes specified disclosures. N.D. Cent.Code § 51-28-01(7) (2003).2…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Iowa Right To Life Committee v. Megan TookerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. IMS Health Inc. v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. La Tour v. City Of FayettevilleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API