Legal Opinion
Miller v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 16, 2002No. 3:01 CV 7273PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c) and (d) (“RICO”). Plaintiffs assert jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), or, in the alternative, for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). For the following reasons, defendants’ motions shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs were supervisors for Conrail, the predecessor to defendant Norfolk Southern Railroad…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bambu v. EI Dupont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Dixon v. Huntington Natl. BankOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Broad, Vogt & Conant, Inc. v. Alsthom Automation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- Fontain v. LaneDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022