Broad, Vogt & Conant, Inc. v. Alsthom Automation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss count V of Plaintiffs’ complaint [docket entry 6]. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), the Court has determined that oral argument would not significantly aid in the disposition of this motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant Defendants’ motion.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs in this case are a group of construction companies and the owner of those companies. They are: Broad, Vogt & Conant (“BVC”); Broad Industrial Corporation (“BIC”); Broad Rack Structures, Inc. (“BRS”); Broad Financial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Carolyn Morgan v. Church's Fried ChickenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Jackson Leeds v. Jonathan S. Meltz, Anthony Mansfield, Susan Ferraro, Merrick T. Rossein, Unknown John and Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Mayer v. MylodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chaness & Simon, P.C. v. SimonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003